In more detail
Pensions at Sterling & Law
Find everything before moving anything
The first job is an inventory, and it is almost always longer than the client expects. Automatic enrolment means short jobs leave pensions behind, and a thirty-year career can easily produce six or seven arrangements with providers that have since merged, rebranded or been bought.
The Pension Tracing Service finds schemes where contact has been lost. Old payslips and P60s fill the gaps. Then each provider is written to directly with four questions: current value, total annual cost, the death benefits, and what guarantees would be lost on transfer. Until that list exists, any decision to consolidate is a guess dressed up as tidying.
The guarantees people throw away by accident
Some older contracts carry benefits that modern ones do not and cannot. A guaranteed annuity rate promises to convert the fund into income at a rate set decades ago, which can be very substantially better than anything available today. Others carry guaranteed minimum pensions, or terminal bonuses that only pay if the policy runs to its original date.
None of this appears on an annual statement. It lives in the policy conditions, which is why it has to be asked for in writing. Transferring away from a guarantee is occasionally still right — but it should be a decision taken knowingly, with the value of what is being given up on the table.
The default fund problem
Most people in a workplace scheme are in its default fund, because that is what happens when no choice is made. Default funds are designed to be defensible for a very broad population, which means they are rarely wrong and rarely right.
The mismatch matters most near retirement, where some defaults still move automatically towards assets suited to buying an annuity — sensible for someone who intends to buy one, and actively unhelpful for someone planning to stay invested and draw down. It is worth knowing which your scheme does, and when it starts doing it.
Allowances, relief and the traps around them
Pension contributions attract tax relief, within limits, and those limits interact with income in ways that catch people out — particularly higher earners, anyone with variable income, and anyone who has already begun drawing flexibly from a pension, which restricts what can be contributed afterwards.
We do not quote the current figures here because they change and a website that states them is wrong within the year. What matters is that the limits exist, that exceeding them creates a tax charge rather than a warning, and that the position should be checked before a large contribution rather than after.